MIGR8 CASE STORIES
EMPLOYER SPONSORSHIPSource published: 3 Aug 2026

A job title could not explain the whole role.

A Contract Administrator nomination was questioned over driving duties.

MIGR8 AUSTRALIA · Editorial review: 5 October 2026
Illustrative image; not the people involved in the reported case.

A third-party public report, summarised by MIGR8. This was not a case managed by MIGR8.

The situation and reported outcome

Kindra describes a refused 186 nomination where officials believed driving was the main work. Contracts, financial records and business evidence explained the skilled role and incidental driving. The Tribunal approved the nomination.

∞

The MIGR8 perspective

show what the employee actually does and why the business needs that work. Titles alone leave gaps.

Your next move

Connect duties to work products, reporting lines and business activity. Nomination approval and visa approval remain distinct decisions.

Explore the source

Kindra Migration Lawyers

Original MIGR8 summary based on the linked source. Rules and circumstances can change. Other case outcomes do not guarantee a similar result.

MIGR8 AUSTRALIA

General information and editorial commentary. Check current rules and your circumstances before acting.

WhatsApp · +61 425 481 703