MIGR8 CASE STORIES
EMPLOYER SPONSORSHIPSource published: 28 May 2026

A growing courier business needed more than more drivers.

Contract complexity became central to a sponsorship review.

MIGR8 AUSTRALIA · Editorial review: 5 October 2026
Illustrative image; not the people involved in the reported case.

A third-party public report, summarised by MIGR8. This was not a case managed by MIGR8.

The situation and reported outcome

Kris Ahn Lawyers describes a courier business whose Contract Administrator nomination was refused. A review explained its client, contractor and vehicle agreements. The firm reports approval of both the nomination and 482 visa.

∞

The MIGR8 perspective

occupation fit is about substantiated duties and business need, not an assumption about one industry.

Your next move

Map contracts and responsibilities to real work. Ownership in the business does not remove the need to satisfy sponsorship and visa requirements.

Explore the source

Kris Ahn Lawyers

Original MIGR8 summary based on the linked source. Rules and circumstances can change. Other case outcomes do not guarantee a similar result.

MIGR8 AUSTRALIA

General information and editorial commentary. Check current rules and your circumstances before acting.

WhatsApp · +61 425 481 703